USPTO serial 99528999
MIKOLEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JARAMILLO, JAVIER R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIKOLEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sui County, Henan Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Levy
Stephen Levy SL Trademark Law Firm PA1 Sansome StreetSuite 1400San Francisco, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; Swimming pool sweepers; Screwdrivers, electric; Shears, electric; 3D printers; Electric vacuum food sealers for household purposes; Lawnmowers; Electric vacuum cleaners; Electric cordless sweepers; Electric vegetable peelers; Gas cutting guns; Chainsaws; Chains for chain saws; Power-operated coffee grinders; Carpet cleaning machines; Electric vacuum cleaners and their components; High pressure washers; Electric clothing pressing machines; Multi-purpose steam cleaners; Household cleaning robots with artificial intelligence; Power-operated meat grinders | PARTIALLY PAID | Nov 3, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |