USPTO serial 99529668
COVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Whiteford, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. May
David L. May Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street, NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent To Use) Downloadable computer software for managing software development and operations (DevOps), tracking efficiency of software development tools within an organization, and delivering real-time analytics data related to software development and operations (DevOps); Downloadable software for automating organizational software development and operations (DevOps); Downloadable computer software for big data analytics, namely, software for analyzing and processing large sets of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Business consulting services; Business research and business consultancy related thereto in the field of business operations and business organizational performance; Providing business information in the field of business operations a business organizational performance; Providing business intelligence services and business data analytics consulting services; Business consulting in the field of big data analytics; Database administration for others, namely, database management; Data processing services; Data processing management services; Automated data processing services | ACTIVE | Feb 9, 2025 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Software engineering services and computer software consulting services in the field of software development and operations (DevOps) and custom software development; Development of software for secure network operations; Design and development of operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring machine learning software for enabling computers to learn to perform tasks autonomously; Software engineering services; Software engineering consultancy; Design, development and implementation of software; Design and development of computer software for automatization; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; Computer software development in the field of big data analytics; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for big data analytics, namely, software for analyzing and processing large sets of data | ACTIVE | Feb 9, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |