USPTO serial 99530774
SPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberlee A Boyle
Kimberlee A Boyle RICHARD LAW GROUP5910 N. Central Expwy.Suite 325Dallas, TX 75206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for quizzes and activities for learning general knowledge subjects; Downloadable software for solving puzzles to strengthen mental fitness; Downloadable software for puzzles; Downloadable software for use for cognitive training, mental fitness, psychometric testing and cognitive ability assessment purposes; Downloadable software for cognitive skills assessment and analytics; Downloadable software for the delivery of puzzles and training programs; Downloadable software for the delivery of mental fitness testing and assessment content for personal learning and improvement in professional settings; Downloadable software for the training, testing, tracking and improvement of cognitive skills; Downloadable software for the field of human self-improvement; Downloadable software for testing and quizzing for the purpose of training cognitive skills | ACTIVE | Nov 12, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |