Drawing for PROGRESSIVE PLAY

USPTO serial 99536066

PROGRESSIVE PLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE PLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, a feature of interactive electronic toy animals and toy robots, namely, a software program that allows the toys to learn and react to voice commands, sold as an integral component of the interactive electronic toy animals and toy robotsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance