USPTO serial 99537784
WAVE FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLONCH, ABIGAIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVE FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen M. Burch
Kathleen M. Burch K&L Gates LLP1 Congress StreetSuite 2900Boston, MA 02114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical device, namely, microwave therapy device for the treatment of skin; medical skin improvement device using a laser; Medical device, namely, laser treatment device for the treatment of skin; medical device that delivers heat and high-frequency energy to the skin and subcutaneous tissue for plastic surgery and treatment purposes; medical high-frequency stimulator; medical high-frequency electromagnetic therapy apparatus for skin care; medical phototherapy device for the treatment of skin; laser skin care device for medical purposes; medical laser light therapy device for the treatment of skin; medical laser device for the treatment of skin; medical low-frequency electric therapy skin care device; high frequency electromagnetic generators for medical treatment; medical laser for skin treatment, all the foregoing goods excluding surgical masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |