USPTO serial 99537934
ASSURANCEPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHOEN,LINDSEY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASSURANCEPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEREK STEVEN WILCZYNSKI
DEREK STEVEN WILCZYNSKI BLANCO WILCZYNSKI, PLLC1607 E. BIG BEAVERSTE 201Troy, MI 48083Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | AssurancePlus promotes and markets specialty products and programs that are primarily membership-based and which offer a number of features: Warranty Vault (storage for information), ID Theft Restoration (support of a member's identity is stolen), and various reimbursements (such as auto deductible reimbursement). The products and programs are generally offered at auto dealers, credit unions, and banks, as well as directly through a point-of-sale option. In addition, AssurancePlus consults with its clients on how to enhance the products and programs, add features to them, and get them in the hands of consumers. | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |