USPTO serial 99540958
VEMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, KAREINE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fremont, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan Justin Fibel
370 Cobalt DrVista, CA 92083United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Information and advisory services relating to software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for generating business analysis reports; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; Research in the field of artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data assessment; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data analytics; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |