Drawing for BARNACLE BILL'S

USPTO serial 99541383

BARNACLE BILL'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARNACLE BILL'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Curtis Edmondson

Joseph Curtis Edmondson Law Offices of J. Curtis Edmondson3720 SW 141st Avenue, Suite 212Beaverton, OK 97005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed seafood; Smoked fish; Seasoned fishACTIVEApr 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance