USPTO serial 99542600
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rockville, MD, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Miller
David S. Miller McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP300 South Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Modified carbonaceous precursor materials for industrial purposes; modified carbonaceous precursor materials for use in the manufacture of synthetic graphite; carbonaceous precursor materials derived from anthracite for industrial purposes; none of the foregoing for use in well-drilling applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Anthracite; none of the foregoing for use in well-drilling applications | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |