USPTO serial 99542613
TRAFFISTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TRAFFISTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONHEIM AM RHEIN, DE
Farnborough, Hampshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R Geissler
Martin R Geissler Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, PC125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photography speedometers; traffic measuring devices, namely, vehicle location, identification, and speed detection system devices comprised primarily of display monitors, computers, image sensors and video cameras; traffic monitoring devices in the nature of computer software, in particular their housings, in particular for red light monitoring, license plate recognition, recording and checking the payment of road tolls and tolls, recording traffic density, traffic flow and vehicle types, namely, computer software for radar apparatus and lidar apparatus, cameras, radar detector and lidar detectors, radar guns for police work and lidar guns for police work, radar object detectors for use on vehicles and lidar object detectors for use on vehicles; sensors for electric radar sensors and electric lidar sensors, electric laser sensors, piezoelectric sensors, inductive loops in the nature of electrical inductors and video cameras; electrical distance measuring apparatus; radar and lidar devices, namely, radar apparatus, lidar apparatus, and radar detectors, and lidar detectors; electronic memories for data processing systems; image receiving devices, namely, digital medial receivers; monitoring devices, namely, electronic speed indicators; time recording apparatus; recorded computer operating programs for tracking and monitoring traffic patterns; recorded computer software for tracking and monitoring traffic patterns; data processing apparatus; photographic apparatus, namely, cameras and lenses for photographic apparatus; flash light devices, namely, flashlights for use in photography; civil security data collection apparatus, namely, vehicle location, identification, and speed detection system devices comprised primarily of image sensors and video cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |