Drawing for 360 INPATIENT REVIEW

USPTO serial 99542805

360 INPATIENT REVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITROS, CATHERINE SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 360 INPATIENT REVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

Jeffrey M. Becker Haynes and Boone, LLP2801 N. Harwood Street, Suite 2300Dallas, TX 75201United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting and advisory services in the field of healthcare payment accuracy; Providing integrated payment accuracy services for auditing inpatient medical claims, in order to identify, correct, and optimize healthcare payments for healthcare providers and payers; Providing business information in the field of healthcare payment accuracy; Providing business data, and analytics services in the field of healthcare payment accuracy, namely, business data analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 11, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance