USPTO serial 99547147
GATE VIKING ENGINEERING & LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARQUET-HORNBACK, ELENA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GATE VIKING ENGINEERING & LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Houston, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret A. Boulware
Margaret A. Boulware Boulware & Valoir PLLC2603 Augusta Dr.Suite 1350Houston, TX 77057Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Engineering project management in the nature of construction project management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services for energy facilities and assets and of all aspects of onshore and offshore oil and gas drilling completions and production including flow assurance, chemical systems engineering, production chemistry engineering, materials selection and corrosion engineering, sub-surface engineering, flow computer modeling services, computer systems engineering, computer database systems monitoring support services, maintenance management planning, process hazard analysis facilitation, facilities, topsides and subsea startup support, engineering project management, pipeline pigging engineering support, well engineering, engineering consulting.; Metallurgical laboratory services in the areas of materials chemical analysis, metallographic evaluations, microstructural characterization, corrosion testing, fracture surface evaluations (SEM/EDS fractography evaluations), mechanical testing (tensile, hardness, CVN), field inspections, finite element analysis (FEA), failure analysis, namely, forensic engineering, field investigation, legal support/expert witness, root cause analysis and fit-for purpose evaluations. | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal support in the nature of expert witness services in legal matters in the field of energy facilities engineering and metallurgy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |