USPTO serial 99547543
RIDGELINE DATA SHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIDGELINE DATA SHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Incline Village, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caitlin R. Byczko
Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to data on the Internet in the field of investment management, wealth management, financial asset management, client management, portfolio management, portfolio accounting, trade order management, investment research, and regulatory compliance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing the firm-wide operations, data, trade and investment lifecycle and for providing information in the fields of investment management, wealth management, financial asset management, client management, portfolio management, portfolio accounting, trade order management, investment research, and regulatory compliance; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for enabling integration, sharing, and use of data for analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) applications; Computer technology consultancy in the field of data integration, data management, data warehousing, data sharing, data analytics, and data security; Consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for data warehousing, data management, data mining and database analytics; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for data warehousing, data management, data mining, and database analytics; Cloud computing featuring software for use by others for data warehousing, data management, data migration, data mining and database analytics; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use by others for data warehousing, data management, data migration, data mining and database analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |