Drawing for FENCER

USPTO serial 99548131

FENCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANDER, DREW M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FENCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron D. Hendelman

Aaron D. Hendelman Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati650 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, CA 94304-1050United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for vulnerability management across code, secrets, configurations, infrastructure, application programming interfaces, applications, and networks; real time security event detection and incident response orchestration in the nature of data security consultancy; computer software consultancy in the field of integration with developer workflows and continuous integration and continuous delivery/deployment pipelines; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for compliance automation, namely, collecting and organizing compliance evidence, performing access reviews, mapping controls, and generating audit-ready reports; design and development of data security policies and procedures for others; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for unified threat detection and response across endpoints, cloud environments, and applications; computer security services, namely, monitoring of computer systems for cybersecurity breaches, managed detection and response (MDR), and computer security threat analysis for protecting data; penetration testing of computer systems; technology consulting in the field of cybersecurity, namely, advisory services on secure software development, secure configuration, remediation of identified vulnerabilities, and integration of security controls into developer workflows; security testing of computer software, computer networks, and cloud infrastructure; conducting red team assessments being technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 21, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 18, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 26, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 21, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance