USPTO serial 99548711
CRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Pearce
Jonathan Pearce SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd., Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Customizing computer software by enhancing command line workflows through stylization of in line code; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in enhancing and managing command line workflows and terminal based applications; Customizing computer software; Developing customized software in the field of terminal based workflows and applications for others; Design, development, and implementation of software for creating, customizing and managing command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for creating, customizing and managing command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications; Software development and product development in the field of creating, customizing and managing command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications; Installation and maintenance of command line customization software; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for creating, customizing and managing command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, customizing and managing command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications; Computer services, namely, customizing computer software used by others by adding command line interfaces and enhancing terminal based workflows and applications servers to others | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |