USPTO serial 99550307
CELLULAR INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLULAR INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Piascik Christoff
Susan Piascik Christoff Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of computer platforms for cell and tissue modeling, simulation, data generation and predictive analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cell structure prediction, modeling, analysis, and data generation; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating visualizations, insights and reports that enable the user to analyze and modify results and make changes to the core dataset and for selecting and altering predictive models in the fields of cellular engineering, cellular therapy, immunotherapy and regenerative medicine; Testing of computing methods, computer software algorithms, computer software, and computer hardware for cell structure modeling and prediction; Technology consultation in the field of software for scientific and medical research, namely, cellular modeling and predictive analysis; Advanced product research, design and development in the field of software for cellular modeling and predictive analysis for discovery and development of cell therapies and regenerative medicines; Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research in the fields of analytics and data mining, data analysis, data transformation, data visualization, statistical analysis, all for cellular modeling, simulation and predictive analysis; Engineering of biological cells and tissues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |