USPTO serial 99552770
POLARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Kurian Shaw
Anna Kurian Shaw Hogan Lovells Cadwalader US LLP555 13th Street NWWashington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for design and development of computer systems and software applications; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring computer software development tools; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for visualization of software and design of computer systems; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for computer software security testing and vulnerability management; Software-as-a-service (SaaS) services featuring software for testing software to ensure proper functioning and assess security vulnerability and for benchmarking software reliability; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in identifying, verifying, analyzing, testing, and improving software application vulnerabilities; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying computer software defects, ensuring regulatory compliance, and analyzing software applications to assess security vulnerability; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for security testing of web-based software applications; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for automated dynamic software application security testing; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for analyzing software composition for the purpose of managing risk from use of open source and third-party software code in software applications and containers; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the purpose of software application security management to scale testing, remediation, and risk management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the purpose of discovering and remediating security weaknesses in computer software and computer networks; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for automatic detection of security threats and vulnerabilities in computer software; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in tracking data used in web-based software applications for purposes of identifying application vulnerabilities, ensuring application compliance with industry standards and regulations and assessing vulnerabilities and risks through an interactive visual dashboard; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in scanning, reviewing, evaluating and reporting on the composition and components of other computers for identifying, tracking and managing of software assets and use of third party software, and to ensure compliance with industry, legal or governmental regulations by businesses and institutions; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for conducting computer software audits and reporting the results of such audits; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for automating open source security and license compliance during application development; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for use in testing computer software applications and systems and identifying security vulnerabilities by emulating conditions that cause exceptions or crashes in software functionality; testing and evaluation of software, software containing open source code, and software applications for interoperability and compliance with industry standards and established policies and standards via a website; Consultation services in the field of design, development, and testing of computer software; Consultation services in the field of software security risk assessment, namely, identification of security weaknesses in software design for purposes of understanding secure design practices, developing and planning software security strategy, mitigating security flaws, meeting organizational compliance mandates, and addressing business risks; Consultation services in the field of software security risk assessment, namely, scanning, penetration, and network testing to assess security vulnerabilities; Software consultation services relating to identifying, analyzing and reducing the risks of software failure; Computer software consulting services in the field of application development, computer code review, computer security, and software architecture analysis; Computer software consulting services relating to the software development and management process and managing security risks associated with the development and ownership of software; Computer systems analysis, namely, reviewing, evaluating and reporting on the composition and components of computer software on the computer systems of others in order to assist businesses and government organizations in identifying, tracking and managing their software assets and use of third party software, and to ensure compliance with industry standards; Computer software auditing services in the nature of testing of computer software for the purpose of assessing open source, legal, compliance, security, and quality risks; Computer services, namely, conducting software audits in the nature of testing of computer software using proprietary software to scan the software of others in order to detect and report on the software content found within, and evaluating and reporting the results of such audits in the nature of computer systems analysis; Computer software consultation services in the field of conducting software audits and implementing best practices in the identification, tracking and management of software assets and the use of third party software; Computer services, namely, providing computer software and software application programming consulting services; Computer services, namely, providing information in the fields of technology and software development for tracking and analyzing computer software development, via a website; Computer security consultation in the field of monitoring and testing computer systems; Consulting and technical support services, namely, providing technical advice related to software testing, control and analysis; Technical support services, namely, monitoring and reporting of open source vulnerabilities in software application development; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer software and hardware problems | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |