USPTO serial 99555684
TIRRENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TIRRENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur J. DeBaugh
Arthur J. DeBaugh Allman Spry Leggett Crumpler & Horn, P.A.380 Knollwood Street, Suite 700Winston-Salem, NC 27103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Olive oil; Oils for food; Extra virgin olive oil; Fruit marmalade; Marmalade; Fruit spreads; Vegetable-based spreads; Jellies for food, other than confectionery; Fruit jelly spreads; Jellies, jams, compotes, fruit and vegetable spreads; Vegetable jellies; Vegetable pate; Vegetable pastes; Olive puree; Cheese spreads; Spreads consisting mainly of eggs; Spreads consisting mainly of fruits; Truffle-based spread products (truffle creams); Pickled vegetables; Vegetables, processed; Preserved vegetables; Vegetables, tinned; Salted vegetables; Fruit, processed; Dried fruit; Fruit, preserved; Fruits, tinned; Processed fruits, fungi, vegetables, nuts and pulses; Compotes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application)(Based on Intent to Use) Vinegar; Salad cream; Sauces; Salted sauces; Pasta sauce; Cooking sauces; Dairy-based sauces; Tomato sauce; Mushroom sauces; Meat gravies; Pasta condiments; Dried pasta; Wholemeal pasta; Deep frozen pasta; Pasta containing stuffings; Fresh pasta; Fresh egg pasta; Dried and fresh pastas, noodles and dumplings; Ravioli; Gnocchi; Rice; Processed grains, starches, and goods made thereof, baking preparations and yeasts; Bakery goods; Cereals; Processed grains; Cereal flour; Toasted grain flour; Preparations made from cereals; Food preparations based on grains; Flour; Corn flour; Maize flour; Wheat flour; Flour ready for baking; Flour mixes; Farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; Edible pasta; Gluten-free pasta; Pasta shells; Pasta preserves; Pasta dishes; Stuffed pasta; Dough flour; Frozen pastry sheets (Based on Intent to Use) Pasta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |