USPTO serial 99557781
SNAPLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAZARAA, HAMID HESHAM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNAPLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duy Thai
Duy Thai Gamma LawP.O. Box 136San Francisco, CA 94104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for application, data and database integration, and integrating networked applications, databases, and cloud computing environments for the purpose of managing the workflow between them; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for integration of cloud computing environments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application, data and database integration, and integrating networked applications, databases, and cloud computing environments for the purpose of managing the workflow between them; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for integration of cloud computing environments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating text in response to natural language text commands and prompts using machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for using artificial intelligence for use in natural language processing, machine learning, workflow management, for generating processing flows and creating data pipelines; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating data pipelines, links to applications, software programs, databases, data warehouses, and devices, processing flows, workflows, expressions, and scripts for data automation, data integration, and data conversion using natural language commands; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for development of interoperability and integration software tools that enable data and database integration, and integration and interoperability of networked applications, databases, and cloud computing environments for the purpose of managing the data and workflow between them; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for use in the integration of cloud computing environments | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |