Drawing for OT DLM CUMULUS

USPTO serial 99560093

OT DLM CUMULUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYER, BENJAMIN A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OT DLM CUMULUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice Housey

Janice Housey Litmus Law PLLC4 Weems Lane #240Winchester, VA 22601United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for cybersecurity and device lifecycle management, namely, software for defining, administering, monitoring, testing, and auditing cybersecurity requirements and security controls for devices, products, and systems from development through deployment and decommissioning; SaaS featuring software for supply chain cybersecurity risk management, namely, asset management, vulnerability detection and remediation tracking, compliance monitoring with industry and regulatory standards, generation of compliance evidence and reports, and management of software bills of materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 21, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance