USPTO serial 99561299
GOODLEAP HOME CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 802
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODLEAP HOME CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Roseville, CA, US
Roseville, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
Daniel M. Cislo CISLO & THOMAS LLP2829 Townsgate Rd., Suite 330Westlake Village, CA 91361United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing digital home equity lines of credit (HELOC) and the issuance of a payment card for use therewith; issuance of credit cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |