USPTO serial 99563328
TERARECON AV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with TERARECON AV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Durham, NC, US
Durham, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
Christopher A. Proskey BrownWinick Law Firm666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000Des Moines, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Downloadable computer software for analyzing medical imaging data using artificial intelligence; Downloadable computer software for imaging visualization and AI analysis software for medical imaging; Downloadable computer software for structural heart imaging simulations; Downloadable computer software for analyzing medical imaging data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for medical imaging visualization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing medical imaging data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for structural heart imaging simulations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for automated workflows for medical procedures; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for processing, interpreting, and visualizing medical imaging data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing medical imaging data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for improving clinical decision making, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for medical imaging visualization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automated workflows for medical procedures; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for improving clinical decision making, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for medical imaging visualization; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for improving clinical decision making, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for medical imaging visualization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for improving clinical decision making, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data analytics; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for structural heart imaging simulations; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for medical imaging visualization | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |