USPTO serial 99563448
DRDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEISER, EMILY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Houston, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Cain
John C. Cain Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP1330 Post Oak Blvd., STE 2850Houston, TX 77056United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting, management, and planning services in the field of business knowledge capture and retention and process optimization; Business risk assessment services; Business risk management consultation; Business succession planning; Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of business strategy, business succession, business transition, and termination strategy; Profit survey and analysis; Tax and taxation planning, advice, information and consultancy services | ACTIVE | May 4, 2002 |
| 036 | Accounts receivables financing; Business liquidation services, financial; Cash management; Conducting financial feasibility studies; Financial advice and consultancy services; Financial asset management; Financial counseling services, namely, helping others build a better working relationship with their money; Financial retirement plan consulting services; Financial risk management consultation | ACTIVE | May 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |