USPTO serial 99567197
HELIOPOLIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTIAN EDMUND
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELIOPOLIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas T. Santucci
Justin Johanson RLPS3137 E Elwood ST STE 130,DPT#EXAZ1394Phoenix, AZ 85304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Computer software platforms, downloadable, for data analysis; Computer software platforms, downloadable, for processing and analyzing data; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, tablets, computers, portable media players, handheld computers, namely, software for data analysis; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, tablets, computers, portable media players, handheld computers, namely, software for processing and analyzing data; Downloadable computer software platforms for data analysis; Downloadable computer software platforms for processing and analyzing data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data analysis; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for analyzing and processing data; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for data analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing and processing data; Technological consultation in the technology field of cybersecurity, hybrid cloud, infrastructure engineering, and modernization of technological services; Computer software design; Technological consultation in the technology field of security architecture, engineering, and compliance support for commercial and federal environments; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity, hybrid cloud, infrastructure engineering, and technological services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |