USPTO serial 99569785
RIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Laemmle Watts
Julie Laemmle Watts Bricker Graydon Wyatt LLP400 W. Market Street, Ste. 2000Bricker Graydon Wyatt - TrademarksLouisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assessing climate risk exposure, generating resilience recommendations, preparing business continuity plans, tracking implementation tasks, and producing analytics dashboards, maps, and reports for organizations and government entities; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for assessing climate risk exposure, generating resilience recommendations, preparing business continuity plans, tracking implementation tasks, and producing analytics dashboards, maps, and reports for organizations and government entities; providing online, non-downloadable application programming interface (API) software for software integration in the fields of risk assessment, resilience planning, and business continuity risk exposure | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |