USPTO serial 99570275
SURESHOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBLE, JONATHON I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURESHOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN LAUT
STEVEN LAUT SHERMAN IP LLP15760 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric fluidic syringe pumps being machines; syringes and valves sold as component parts of electric fluidic syringe pump machines; All of the foregoing for controlling the flow of fluids in analytical, laboratory, scientific research, life-science, clinical, and diagnostic apparatus and in vitro diagnostic testing applications, and not specifically adapted for medical use, not for general industrial use, and not in the nature of infusion pumps | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |