Drawing for AI VISION

USPTO serial 99571762

AI VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIRCHGASSER, ROSS LEONARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AI VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S Ehrlich

Burton S Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerators; refrigerators equipped with cameras to generate an inventory list, to track expiration dates to allow efficient food management, to recommend tailored recipes after recognizing available items in the fridge, to send relevant instructions to the cooking appliances to make it possible to enhance an automated cooking experience, and to help users to check the inventory in the fridge real time and purchase any necessary itemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance