USPTO serial 99571782
EM EUREKA MODULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARQUET-HORNBACK, ELENA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with EM EUREKA MODULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palos Verdes Estates, CA, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Fire-resistant composite panels made of aramid fibers, glass fibers, carbon fibers, or ceramic fibers for use in building construction; semi-finished synthetic plastics in sheet form; non-metallic construction mastic sealants for ceiling, wall and floor tiles, wood panel and asphalt. | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets; Vehicle carpets; Automobile carpets; Underlay for carpets; Carpeting; Carpet underlays; Carpet tiles; Carpet underlining; Carpets and rugs; Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; Linoleum for covering existing floors; Floor coverings, namely, floor runners; Decorative slip-resistant sheets of plastic for covering existing floors; Decorative slip-resistant sheets of vinyl for covering existing floors; Non-slip bathtub mats; Non-slip shower mats; Non-slip mats for baths; Non-slip mats for showers; Non-slip bath tub mats; Non-slip floor mats for use under apparatus; Floor mats in the nature of non-slip pads for use under apparatus to prevent slippage; Rubber floor mats; Floor mats of rubber; Floor mats of synthetic rubber; Floor mats made of rubber | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |