USPTO serial 99572643
VUEES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORDOGNE, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VUEES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Plymouth Meeting, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxim A. Voltchenko
Maxim A. Voltchenko Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP317 George Street, Ste 320New Brunswick, NJ 08901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical x-ray diagnosis apparatus for veterinary purposes; Medical Apparatus for the veterinary market, consisting of endoscopic equipment and an ultrasound apparatus; medical imaging apparatus incorporating artificial intelligence for use in surgical decision support, all for veterinary purposes; diagnostic analyzers for medical purposes, namely, devices for real-time medical image enhancements and image augmentation with a graphic overlay to support surgical procedures, all for veterinary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |