USPTO serial 99577796
INFLIGHTAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFLIGHTAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL, US
WEST PALM BEACH, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN C. KLINE
KAREN C. KLINE DUANE MORRIS LLP5100 Town Center Circle, Suite 400BR-IPDBoca Raton, FL 33486Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and firmware for capturing, processing, and transmitting image, video, and sensor data from unmanned aerial vehicles, mobile ground robots, uncrewed maritime vehicles, fixed cameras, satellites, and networked devices in the internet of things (IoT); Downloadable computer software and firmware for collection, analyzing and reporting of data in the fields of industrial automation, critical-infrastructure protection, site security, public safety, and governmental inspection and monitoring | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for asset-maintenance inspection, physical-security monitoring, public-safety situational awareness, and defense or government surveillance analytics; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for performing inspection, detection, monitoring and automation for enterprise resource-planning (ERP), computerized maintenance-management (CMMS), flight-management, command-and-control, geographic-information, and other operational systems applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collection, analyzing and reporting of data in the fields of industrial automation, critical-infrastructure protection, site security, public safety, and governmental inspection and monitoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |