Drawing for GIGALASER

USPTO serial 99582669

GIGALASER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIGALASER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LOREN LESLIE LUNSFORD

LOREN LESLIE LUNSFORD MARTENSEN WRIGHT PCOne Capital MallSte. 670Sacramento, CA 95814

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electromedical rehabilitative and pain management products for clinical and home use, namely, electrical nerve and muscle stimulators, ultrasonic stimulators, magnet therapy stimulators and laser therapy stimulators; Laser pointers for medical use; Laser pointers for medical purposes; Lasers for medical purposes; Lasers for medical use; Lasers for surgical and medical use; Lasers for the cosmetic treatment of the face and skinACTIVEJan 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance