Drawing for THE TUNNEL GUYS

USPTO serial 99583544

THE TUNNEL GUYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE TUNNEL GUYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank L. Kubler

Frank L. Kubler Oltman, Flynn & Kubler13261 S.W. 54th CourtMiramar, FL 33027United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Plumbing servicesACTIVEJan 7, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance