USPTO serial 99585844
DIIB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORSCHELN, COLLEEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIIB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Park City, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Breck Kadaba
Breck Kadaba Inhouse Counsel PC3101 Ocean Park Blvd., Ste. 100Santa Monica, CA 90405United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Search engine optimization for sales promotion; Search engine optimization for promoting the websites of others; Consulting services in the field of search engine optimization for sales promotion; Search engine optimization for promoting the websites of others in the field of b2b, b2c websites | ACTIVE | Jul 17, 2014 |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for website performance analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for search engine optimization data analysis; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for website traffic analysis; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for digital marketing analytics | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |