Drawing for SLACKFORCE

USPTO serial 99589939

SLACKFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLACKFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIrvine, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing online facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of customer relationship management, customer service, marketing and promotion, artificial intelligence, group communication and collaboration, and software design and development; telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of messages, images, data, and information; electronic transmission of data via the internet, global computer networks, wireless networks, private secure networks, and electronic communication networks; providing internet chatrooms; providing online forums on the Internet and providing portals on the Internet, namely, providing internet chatrooms via a website; instant messaging services; internet services, namely providing multiple-user access to information on the internet concerning the development and generation of computer software for use in businesses as well as the functions and application of such business softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 15, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
May 6, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance