USPTO serial 99591812
IRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson Perkins Coie LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Contract management services for business purposes; Computerized database management; Business data analysis services in the field of business contracts, agreements, and procurement activities; Data processing services in the field of business contracts, agreements, and procurement activities. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in automating electronic agreement, contract, document and file generation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in creating, configuring, customizing, extracting data from, and generating electronic agreements, contracts, documents and files; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in verification of signatory identity in business contracts; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in summarizing, analyzing, and identifying risk in business contracts; none of the foregoing services rendered in the fields of eyecare or ophthalmology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |