USPTO serial 99593755
THE GOOD LORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GOOD LORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Gross
Joshua Gross Peregrine Legal1680 Michigan Ave #815Miami Beach, FL 33139United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |