USPTO serial 99595175
SMART BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
OTTO O. LEE
OTTO O. LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 250SAN JOSE, CA 95126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | baby bottles; baby feeding bottles; breast milk storage bottles; fitted covers for baby feeding bottles; disposable baby bottle liners; holders for feeding bottles, namely, holders for holding babies' bottles in the nature of rigid braces for clamping to babies' seats during feeding; nipples for baby bottles; nursing bottles; tongs specially adapted for baby bottles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |