USPTO serial 99596184
FULCRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLIFFORD, JOANNE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FULCRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judd D. Lauter
Judd D. Lauter Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for configuring, managing, and communicating between electronic devices used by frontline workforces to execute and observe physical tasks; downloadable and recorded computer software for collecting, managing, and analyzing data collected from electronic devices used by frontline workforces to execute and observe physical tasks | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of electronics for others; manufacturing services for others in the field of electronics to the specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses and government organizations; computer software consulting; consulting services in the field of data and network security; computer technology consultancy in the field of computer software and computer hardware for frontline workers; computer software and hardware design and development; planning, design and management of information technology systems; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for configuring, managing, and communicating between electronic devices used by frontline workforces to execute and observe physical tasks; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for collecting, managing, and analyzing data collected from electronic devices used by frontline workforces to execute and observe physical tasks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |