Drawing for BLUECHIP

USPTO serial 99598857

BLUECHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUECHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LIEL HOLLANDER

LIEL HOLLANDER Hollander Law PC10 Bond StSuite 420Great Neck, NY 11021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services, namely, planning, operational oversight, and management of subsidiary and portfolio companies for others; Business management services rendered under management contracts, namely, providing operational management and administration of small and mid-sized businesses for others; Business organization consulting and business organization and operation consultancy in the field of structuring the operations of subsidiary companies and small and mid-sized enterprises for growth; Business development consulting services, namely, identifying ownership, acquisition, and partnership opportunities for small and mid-sized enterprisesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 6, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance