CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PROTEINLOCK

USPTO serial 99599442

PROTEINLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTEINLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert H. Finn

Herbert H. Finn Greenberg Traurig, LLP360 North Green StreetSuite 1300Chicago, IL 60607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Ready to drink (RTD) beverages, namely ultra-filtered milk-based protein beveragesACTIVEJan 13, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2026ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance