Drawing for SKY STRIKE

USPTO serial 99599502

SKY STRIKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKY STRIKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan J. Massey

Bryan J. Massey Massey Bean & Lewis50 W. Broadway, Suite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and recorded computer software and applications for aircraft navigation and aerial electro-optical fire detection; aerial fire detection and firefighting equipment, namely, specialized fixed-wing airtankers; aerial fire detection and suppression and ground support systems comprised of water and fire retardant storage tanks, hoses, valves, pumps, chutes, charge gauges, mounting bases and straps, pull cables, nozzles, fittings, and tubingACTIVE—
012aircraft; structural aircraft parts; aircraft for forest fire detection and firefighting; structural parts of aircraft for forest fire detection and firefightingACTIVE—
016Printed manuals in the field of aircraftACTIVE—
039Forest management services, namely, fire airspace management in the nature of air traffic monitoring and separation services; High-volume, continuous water conveying services, namely, aerial water distribution and supplyACTIVE—
042aircraft design and modifications; designing and implementing aircraft structural modifications, providing online non-downloadable computer software and applications for aircraft navigation and aerial electro-optical fire detection systems, forest fire management services, namely, aerial surveying, aerial fire detection and aerial fire suppressionACTIVE—
045fire detection and fire fighting services; wildfire detection and wildfire fighting services and wildfire suppression services being aerial fire fighting; wildfire suppression preparedness planning services, namely, aerial fire fighting consultancy and training; forest fire management services, namely, aerial fire detection and suppression in the nature of aerial firefightingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance