Drawing for JARDINS DE BAGATELLE

USPTO serial 99606017

JARDINS DE BAGATELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSBERG, MADELEINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JARDINS DE BAGATELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Strickland Ricketts

Allison Strickland Ricketts Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes; Eau de toilette; Eau de parfumACTIVEAug 31, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 18, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 17, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 21, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 21, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance