USPTO serial 99606183
ELEVATE AIOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEVATE AIOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Naperville, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian J. Block
Ian J. Block Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP225 West Randolph StreetSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; Consultancy in the field of software design; Technical consulting services in the fields of artificial intelligence implementation, datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Business technology software consultation services; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Consulting in the field of IT services management; Consulting in the field of IT operations management; Computer software consultancy; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Computer software consulting; Computer programming consultancy; Consultation about the maintenance and updating of computer software; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; Consultation services relating to computer software; Technological consulting services for digital transformation; IT consulting services relating to configuration, installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; IT consulting services relating to configuration, installation, maintenance, and repair of computer software in the field of agentic IT solutions; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software and non-downloadable computer applications for data migration and data integration; Computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Cloud storage services for electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |