USPTO serial 99606679
MICROGRID ECONOMIC DISPATCH ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABID, NABEELA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MICROGRID ECONOMIC DISPATCH ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Edge
Richard Edge Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.2350 NE Hopkins CourtPullman, WA 99163United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus, namely, electronic controllers, and computer hardware, all for monitoring, protection, control, and automation of electric power systems; electric power systems comprising computer hardware for monitoring, protection, control, and automation of electric power systems; computer systems comprised of computer hardware to control and automate integration of electric power generation sources; computer systems comprised of computer hardware to control and automate microgrids | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, engineering, and engineering commissioning of electric power control and automation systems; design, engineering, and engineering commissioning of electronic power system transmission and distribution units; design, engineering and engineering commissioning of power distribution and transmission system control, protection, automation and monitoring systems; engineering services in the field of protection, control, monitoring, and automation of electric power systems; design, engineering, and engineering commissioning of electric power microgrid control and automation systems; design, engineering, and engineering commissioning of systems to control and automate integration of electric power generation sources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |