USPTO serial 99610840
DITTO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, DONOVAN ALEXANDER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DITTO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chatham, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Griem, Jr.
John M. Griem, Jr. Carter Ledyard & Milburn, LLP28 Liberty StreetFloor 41New York, NY 10005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for biometric identity verification using palm vein recognition, facial recognition, and liveness detection technology; Downloadable software for cryptographic key-pair generation and management for identity authentication; Downloadable mobile application software for passwordless authentication using device-specific fingerprinting and zero-knowledge proofs; Downloadable software development kits (SDKs) for implementing multi-factor authentication with mobile threat detection capabilities in banking and financial services applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Payment identity verification services for financial transaction authorization; Fraud detection services for banking and financial services; Electronic verification of payment identity for payment processing and financial compliance; Authentication services for preventing financial fraud in banking transactions; Issuance, acceptance, and orchestration of digital identity credentials and attestations for use via electronic wallets, namely, payment verification services; Generation and management of QR-based credentials for customer engagement within electronic wallets, namely, payment verification services using QR-based credentials | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing a secure communication protocol that creates a secure, encrypted communication tunnel between electronic devices, facilitating trusted interactions, namely, providing private and secure real-time electronic communications over a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for biometric identity verification and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance in regulated financial industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |