USPTO serial 99610945
EMACC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NISHIGAYA, CHRISTINE EIKO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with EMACC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomington, MN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad W. Swantz
Chad W. Swantz SUITER SWANTZ IP14301 FNB ParkwaySuite 220Omaha, NE 68154Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for managing medical protocols featuring a decision-making tool that allows medical providers to input custom medications and guidelines, manage drug calculations and equipment usage, track overall patient treatment, scan medication containers using a device to validate correct medication and administration information, create a time-stamped digital verification trail, and allow users to manage their log history and transfer to appropriate patient care records | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |