USPTO serial 99611171
Serial No. 99611171
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 99611171?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miguel C. Danielson
Miguel C. Danielson Danielson Legal LLCOne Mifflin Pl., Ste 400Attn: Trademark AdministratorCambridge, MA 02138Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Nondownloadable publications, namely, blogs and scientific research papers in the field of artificial intelligence; Organizing and conducting educational and social entertainment events in the field of artificial intelligence; Education, namely, conducting seminars and training services in the field of artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a Service services, namely, providing an online, nondownloadable software platform featuring artificial intelligence for building, improving, documenting, sharing, auditing, and deploying artificial intelligence software and workflows; Platform as a Service services, namely, providing an online, nondownloadable software platform featuring artificial intelligence for automating generation of artificial intelligence software and workflows; Computer engineering services in the field of artificial intelligence; Scientific and technological services, namely research and development in the field of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and software; Custom design and development of computer software and artificial intelligence models and systems for others; Implementation, integration, deployment, hosting, operation, maintenance, and monitoring of computer software and artificial intelligence systems as managed services; Technical consulting and advisory services in the field of artificial intelligence and enterprise software; Platform as a Service services, namely, providing an online, nondownloadable software platform for building, improving, documenting, sharing, auditing, and deploying artificial intelligence software and workflows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |