USPTO serial 99611397
KITCHEPOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZULCH, CHRISTOPHER DRAKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITCHEPOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD M. COHN
HOWARD M. COHN HOWARD M. COHN AND ASSOCIATES3468 OLD HICKORY LANEMEDINA, OH 44256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power lawn and garden tools, namely, shredders; Electric milk frothers; Knife sharpening machines; Kitchen mixers, electric; Kitchen grinders, electric | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |