Drawing for MANGO LLMBOOST

USPTO serial 99614153

MANGO LLMBOOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, LACEY M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANGO LLMBOOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hoejae Ryu

Hoejae Ryu NKL LAW3251 Blenheim BlvdSuite 500Fairfax, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AI semiconductors; Graphic processing apparatus, namely, Graphics processor units (GPUs); Data storage apparatus, namely, computer hardware for storage of data; Downloadable data processing software; Data communications hardware in the nature of computer hardware; Data processing units in the nature of computer central processing units; Microprocessors; Semi-conductor memories; Semiconductors integrated circuit chips; Computer network serverACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2026TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Feb 2, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance