USPTO serial 99620449
VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Decatur, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kennington R. Groff
Kennington R. Groff Bekiares Eliezer LLP DBA Founders Legal2870 Peachtree Rd NE #512Atlanta, GA 30305United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing overbooking and communicating with passengers for the travel industry; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for managing overbooking and communicating with passengers for the travel industry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for managing overbooking and communicating with passengers for the travel industry; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for managing overbooking and communicating with passengers for the travel industry; all of the foregoing for use in connection with passenger travel and none of the foregoing for use in connection with logistics, transportation management, fleet mobility, or accounting | ACTIVE | Apr 2, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |